Talk:Air travel

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Travel and Tourism High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007-11-6 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 06:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Global Viewpoints?

'The difference between Economy and First Class when travelling by rail is often not as much...'

In my opinion, this does not refect a global viewpoint, for example here in the UK what on here is described as 'Economy' is generally referred to as 'Standard' or 'Standard Class' - I'm unsure as to how it is known in the US or Asia, however. Would like opinions on a possible change. --79.66.61.40 (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the sentence "The differences between premium economy and economy are quite significant, but the cost is not greatly altered by purchasing a Premium Economy ticket" is opinionated. I would disagree completely - the benefits of premium economy are of little use and the ticket cost is significantly dearer. Can this be reworded somehow? 77.97.49.170 (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article in general lacks any substantial content. It provides a very crude read, suitable for maybe a 12 yr old doing a project. I vote for a substantial re-write!70.79.161.243 (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BOLD. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Commercial aviation

Both this article and Commercial aviation cover much of the same material if any future Wikipedians are interested. DHHornfeldt (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editathon June 17

Just a heads-up that as part of an editathon I'm leading on June 17, new editors might be making some edits to this article. I'll be following up shortly afterwards to check for copyright compliance and other quality issues and will clean up stuff if needed. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sopan 2409:4081:1C07:9CB8:0:0:678B:1F0B (talk) 16:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]